← Card's village Hong Kong regional

Fire AggroTier 1

at Card's village Hong Kong regional

decks
4 (4.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
22 15-7-0
overall winrate
68.2%
ELO-adjusted winrate
55.4% avg ELO +2.0 per match
expected value
55.4% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
50.8% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1329 · median 1346 · range 1236–1390 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1064 Q1 1198 Q3 1365 1730
50% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Crux Mage 13.0% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 63.9% +10.4
Wind Seiryuu 11.0% 4 2-2-0 50.0% 50.0% 39.0% -7.0
Hidden 8.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 38.4% -18.6
Water Aetherwing 8.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 38.3% -18.8
Fire Crux Lorraine 7.0% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 63.0% +12.5
Wind Shadowstrike 7.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 46.7% -3.2
Water Genbu 6.0% 0
Fire Suzaku 5.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.3% +8.5
Water Umbra Guardian 5.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.9% +7.9
Water Fractal 4.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.3% +18.0
Fire Slimes 3.0% 0
Fire Suited 3.0% 0
Fire Arcane 2.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 51.1% +1.0
Fire Crux Merlin 2.0% 0
Water Allies 2.0% 0
Wind Crux Lorraine 2.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.6% +13.8
Wind Razorgale 2.0% 0
Fire Byakko 1.0% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.0% 0
Water Crux Mage 1.0% 0
Water Ravishing Mill 1.0% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 1.0% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.0% +12.8
Wind Luxem Zander 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.2% +9.9
Wind Wakeup Combo 1.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.1% -12.6
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Fire Aggro decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 22 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 22 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Expose Darkness +1.00 1 0 0
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa -1.00 0 1 0
Liminal Guide +1.00 1 0 0
Inert Sword -1.00 0 1 0
Peppered Chef +1.00 1 0 0
Vengeful Paramour -1.00 0 1 0
Spark Alight -1.00 0 1 0
Crystallized Destiny -1.00 0 1 0
The Looking Glass -1.00 0 1 0
Immolation Trap -1.00 0 1 0
Corhazi Courier +1.00 1 0 0
Incapacitate +1.00 1 0 0
March Hare, Mottled Host +1.00 1 0 0
Reduce to Ash +1.00 1 0 0
Undying Dreams -1.00 0 1 0
Grand Crusader's Ring +1.00 1 0 0
Fluffy Shopkeep +1.00 1 0 0
Xiao Qiao, Cinderkeeper -1.00 0 1 0
Blinding Orb +1.00 1 0 0
Exploit Vulnerability +1.00 1 0 0
Restorative Flame -1.00 0 1 0
Censer of Restful Peace -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/31758/archetypes/Fire Aggro